Governance

  • Reference to gender or women:
    No reference to gender.
     
  • Context for the reference:
    No reference to gender.
     

  • The ways in which women are positioned in the NDC:
    No reference to gender.
     

Planning

  • The existence of gender-responsive budgeting in the NDC:
    No reference to gender.
     
  • The existence of a participatory planning process for the NDC:
    A participatory process is mentioned but without any details.
     

Implementation

  • The existence of a mechanism or process for monitoring or implementing the NDC:
    Commitment to identify and implement tools to facilitate montoring prorgress towards NDC achievement, but no details.

Governance

  • Reference to gender or women:
    Gender highlighted as cross-cutting issue in the NDC, specific dialogues with women groups mentioned.
     
  • Context for the reference:
    No specific mentioning of women or gender in the thematic sections, with the exception in the plans for integrating climate into the educational system.
     

  • The ways in which women are positioned in the NDC:
    Women mentioned both as vulnerable groups as well as in their central role in agricultural production, food security and community resilience.
     

Planning

  • The existence of gender-responsive budgeting in the NDC:
    No reference to gender.
     
  • The existence of a participatory planning process for the NDC:

    Relatively detailed description of the consultative process towards revising the NDC, incl. mentioning of specific gender aspects.

Implementation

  • The existence of a mechanism or process for monitoring or implementing the NDC:

    Detailed implementation and monitoring approach described in the NDC document.

Colombia

Overall rating:

2015 NDC

2020 NDC

Analysis draws from WEDO’s

Gender Climate Tracker NDC

review framework. Visit 

www.genderclimatetracker.org